亚洲人成网站18禁止中文字幕,国产毛片视频在线看,韩国18禁无码免费网站,国产一级无码视频,偷拍精品视频一区二区三区,国产亚洲成年网址在线观看,国产一区av在线

 

The latest Supreme Court ruling: What were they thinking?

By Tylor Claggett
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, January 25, 2010
Adjust font size:

On January 21, the US Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that corporations and labor unions have the right to unlimited spending during political campaigns. Specifically, the ruling overturned two parts of the previous law that prevented them from using organization funds for commercials either supporting or undermining named candidates and/or issue viewpoints expressed by particular candidates. This is not to say they can contribute unlimited amounts of money directly to political candidates or to their campaigns, because those types of contributions are still limited in the same manner as for individuals.

The supposed logic is (I think), since corporations and labor unions are considered "legal entities," they are afforded the same first amendment rights as individuals. Personally, I do not think the framers of the US Constitution gave much thought, one way or the other, to freedom of speech for organizations. But, then again, I am not a US Constitution expert.

However, there are many accompanying issues and possible outcomes associated with this ruling. Many of the more emotional and controversial issues have been aired in the popular press, but to my knowledge, many other, perhaps more subtle, issues have not been widely discussed. Therefore, in this article, I will suggest several feasible outcomes to contemplate that may follow in the years to come.

Will corporations spend their profits on political campaigns? If so, how much and will they attempt to create and put before the public such ads based on sound financial analyses? For example, corporate spending on political campaigns should be subject to positive net present value (NPV) scrutiny, like any other type of corporate investment. As we teach in the classroom, this is consistent with optimizing stockholder wealth. Will corporate managers do the right thing for stockholders and do the appropriate financial analysis of potential campaign spending or will they adhere to their own agendas and produce yet another type of agency problem?

Assume for the moment that corporate managers do the proper financial analyses for political spending. What happens when some shareholders vehemently disagree with the political positions of their corporation? They can sell their stock as a passive protest. Or, they can challenge corporate management in proxy fights and stockholder meetings. These are the same responses to any traditional agency problem within a corporation. However, is it possible, that over time, the population of a given corporation's stockowners will be of very homogeneous political persuasions? Is this outcome in the best interest of our country and economy? And, will the potential customers of politically active corporations boycott to protest, over buy to support or ignore political spending all together when deciding to purchase said corporation's products?

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
    1. <ul id="556nl"><kbd id="556nl"><form id="556nl"></form></kbd></ul>
      <thead id="556nl"></thead>

      1. <em id="556nl"><tt id="556nl"></tt></em>
        <ul id="556nl"><kbd id="556nl"><form id="556nl"></form></kbd></ul>

        <ul id="556nl"><small id="556nl"></small></ul>
        1. <thead id="556nl"></thead>

          亚洲人成网站18禁止中文字幕,国产毛片视频在线看,韩国18禁无码免费网站,国产一级无码视频,偷拍精品视频一区二区三区,国产亚洲成年网址在线观看,国产一区av在线 人妻无码久久影视 日韩久久久久久久久久久久 精品国产香蕉伊思人在线 无码国产手机在线a√片无灬 91在线视频无码