Is there a Chinese ODI model?
0 
China is already an important player in overseas direct investment (ODI). But for China, this is a relatively recent phenomenon.
Before 2004, the size of Chinese ODI was rather trivial. From 2004, China's ODI grew significantly together with a dramatic expansion of its current account surplus. Its ODI increased from $2.85 billion in 2003 to $56.53 billion in 2009, an average growth rate of about 55 percent a year. During the same period, its share in global ODI flow rose from 0.45 to 5.1 percent. In 2009, China not only became the largest investor among developing countries, but also the fifth largest investor in the world - preceded by the United States, France, Japan and Germany.
China's case challenges the perception that ODI is dominated by developed countries. It is also exceptional in that while China enjoys comparative advantages in certain manufacturing industries, evidenced by its competitiveness in exports and domestic development, they are not areas in which Chinese ODI is concentrated. According to official statistics, most of China's ODI is in the service industry such as commercial financial services, and retail and wholesale sectors.
The industry distribution of Chinese ODI differs markedly from that of other countries. The primary sector (including resources) accounted for 18.7 percent of China's total ODI flow between 2006 and 2008. In comparison, those from developed and other developing economies were only 7.84 and 8.38 percent. These large differences can be attributed mainly to investments in mining, quarrying and the petroleum industry - the latter accounting for 97 percent of China's ODI in the primary sector. This may reflect the strategic use of Chinese ODI to secure long-term supply of resources.
The manufacturing sector got an extremely low share, only 4.7 percent, of China's total ODI - this despite the country's image as a global manufacturing center. To put this in perspective, the share of developed countries in the manufacturing sector averaged 24.1 percent and that of other developing economies, 15 percent.
China's prominent ODI role could simply be the result of the size effect. Since China is a large country, even a relatively low propensity to invest overseas could add up to a big number. It may be the consequence of financial control at home. Such financial policies reduce the cost of capital and make abundant capital available to State-owned enterprises. Or, they could be motivated by strengthening domestic production and economic transformation.
Since these potential explanations may not be mutually exclusive, what is the determinant factor behind China's ODI?
